| Table of Contents | ![]() |
|
Research Protocal
| ||||||
| Bacteriophage display of peptides and its use in determining proteolytic substrate specificity | ||||||
| C. Carrie Liu1, Joti Nahal1, Kim Melton1, Navneet Sharma2 | ||||||
|
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary (AB) Canada.
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary (AB) Canada. | ||||||
| ||||||
|
[HTML Abstract]
[PDF Full Text]
[Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar] |
| How to cite this article |
| Liu CC, Nahal J, Melton K, Sharma N. Bacteriophage display of peptides and its use in determining proteolytic substrate specificity. Edorium J Mol Biol 2015;1:1–5. |
|
Abstract
|
|
Introduction:
Phage display has been employed for many applications including generating highly specific antibodies, determining protein-protein interactions and substrate specificity determination. We have recently used peptide display on T7 phage to successfully determine the substrate specificity of serine proteinases (Sharma et al., 2008, 2011 and 2013). The random phage library we made displays a hexameric peptide on the surface using the library construction described by Karlson et al. (2002) with minor modifications. Each phage particle is able to display no more than one peptide on its surface. Therefore, it is a unique library with each recombinant phage particle displaying a random peptidic substrate on the surface. The library represents all the possible combinations of random hexamers (6.7×107) as described by Deperthese (2002).
Protocol: In this article, we demonstrate the process of building the phage library with random peptides displayed on the surface and using it for determining the substrate specificity of a proteolytic enzyme by repeated rounds of biopanning. The phage library being built is a random one with each phage particle displaying a random peptide on its surface. The library is sequenced after constructing and the frequency of display is noted down. The ratio of displayed amino acid (expected vs. displayed) is determined and it is well within the range (i.e. 0.5–2.0) as shown by Cwirla et al. (1990), confirming the randomness of the library. Conclusion: In order to check the validity of this library, we have tried to find peptidic substrates for a known serine proteinase i.e. trypsin in this paper. All the substrates found for tryspin are known, thus confirming the validity of this library. The aim of this paper is to show an innovative technique for the display of substrate peptides on the surface of bacteriophage and their random selection based on substrate specificity of a protease. It can be applied to any protease for determining its substrate specificity as we have done. | |
|
Keywords:
Phage display, Substrate specificity, T7 Phage, Serine proteinase, Oligonucleotide, Phage plaques, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
| |
|
Introduction
| ||||||
|
Herein, we have described a method used for display of random peptides on the surface of bacteriophage in a way that its frequency of display can be regulated. It can be used in multiple applications like characterization of proteolytic activity as done in this case. Other than characterizing substrate specificity of proteases, the technique can be utilized for various other purposes like identifying specific antibodies, interaction with specific ligands and many more. Many publications have come up since the publication by Cwirla et al., (1990) for identifying ligands displayed on the surface of a bacteriophage. In fact, there have been so many biotech companies as well, working in the pursuit of identifying suitable substrates as well as inhibitors using this technique. We have used this technique for identifying specific substrates for some proteolytic enzymes like implantation serine proteinase (a native dimer), recombinant ISP1, recombinant ISP2 along with human kallikrein 6 (KLK6). The protocol used has been described here in detail. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] | ||||||
|
Materials and Methods
| ||||||
|
The following materials are utilized for the construction of T7 phage-displayed peptide library:
| ||||||
|
PROTOCOL TEXT | ||||||
|
Construction of the phage display library
- CTC, ACT and CCA are the nucleotide codes for leucine, threonine and proline. It is part of the linker and helps in isolation of the random peptide. - (NNK)6 represents the oligonucleotides for random hexamer of amino acids. N represents any nucleotide and K represents thymine (T) or guanine (G). - GGC GGC and GGT GGT are the nucleotides that represent flexible glycine dimers at either end. - CAT CAC CAT CAC CAT CAC are nucleotides that represent a (His)6 tag at the C-terminus. - TAA represent a STOP codon at the 3'-terminus of oligonucleotide. B. GCC GCC TGG AGT GAG AG C. A GCT TTA GTG ATG GTG ATG GTG ATG ACC ACC Different concentrations of these oligonucleotides are made up for use in the construction of the library. 2 µM of A, 40 µM of B and 40 µM of C is made up in the following buffer: 10 mM Tris.Cl (pH 8.0) and 0.2 mM EDTA 2 µM oligonucleotide A -5 µL 40 µM oligonucleotide B -5 µL 40 µM oligonucleotide C -5 µL DDW -65 µL Heat it to 70oC for 5 minutes and let it cool slowly to room temperature. -1.0 µL and de-phosphorylated) 10X Ligase buffer (containing ATP, DTT -0.5 µL but no PEG) DDW -1.0 µL T4 polynucleotide kinase -0.5 µL Annealed oligonucleotides -1.0 µL Incubate it at 37°C for 20 minutes. Add 1.0 µL T4 DNA ligase and incubate at 16°C overnight. Store at 4°C until in vitro packaging. Titration
10-3 dilution - 100 µL phage from 10-2 dilution + 900 µL LB 10-4 dilution - 100 µL phage from 10-3 dilution + 900 µL LB 10-5 dilution - 100 µL phage from 10-4 dilution + 900 µL LB 10-6 dilution - 100 µL phage from 10-5 dilution + 900 µL LB Amplification of the library
PCR Analysis Plaques were eluted from a plate having less than 100 colonies so that it is not difficult to pick the plaques. Single plaques were eluted from the plate into 200 µL SM (Recipe given in the media recipes). Do the PCR in 25 µL reaction volume, without pre-heating and without hot start. Here is the recipe for PCR reaction:
DDW -19.075 µL 50 mM MgCl2 -0.80 µL 10X PCR Buffer (no Mg2+) -2.5 µL 5 µM T7 Select UP Primer -0.5 µL 5 µM T7 Select DOWN Primer -0.5 µL 10 mM each dNTPs -0.5 µL Taq DNA polymerase -0.125 µL Follow the following temperature conditions at different steps: a) 94oC - 3 min b) [94oC - 0.5 min; 52oC - 0.5 min; 72oC - 1 min] x 38 cycles c) 72oC - 6 min Incubate at 4oC till further use. Biopanning Subsequent to binding of amplified phage displayed library (1x1010 pfu) with 100 µL of Ni-NTA agarose beads (Sharma et al. , 2008); biopanning is performed with 10 µL of trypsin (Sigma). A control elution is performed using 500 mM imidazole solution. Repeat the process five times and obtain the plaques after lysis of the E. coli (BLT5403) culture upon infection with plaques. These plaques are plated on LB agarose plates as explained in the titration section above. The plaques from these plates can be amplified and picked for amplification of DNA by PCR using T7 primers. The PCR product was purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Canada). These DNA samples are sent for sequencing after PCR and the amino acid sequences are deduced from there. Characterization
The results of sequencing reactions give the amino acid stretches in each reaction as a result of the DNA sequence of each plaque. The results are compiled in a tabular form and then seen if they represent any uniformity or not. As is evident from the results, the substrate specificity results of trypsin are similar to its published data. | ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
Conclusion
| ||||||
|
It is clear from the results that most of the amino acids show random display in the library. The results could be improved by sequencing a greater number of plaques. The results obtained after biopanning with trypsin are exactly as expected. | ||||||
|
Conclusion
| ||||||
|
AA: Amino Acid, % Obs: % Observed, % Nom: % Nominal, G: Glycine, R: Arginine, V: Valine, T: Threonine, Y: Tyrosine, S: Serine, L: Leucine, E: Glutamic Acid, P: Proline, A: Alanine, C: Cysteine, I: Isoleucine, M: Methionine, K: Lysine, F: Phenylalanine, Q: Glutamine | ||||||
|
References
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
[HTML Abstract]
[PDF Full Text]
|
|
Author Contributions:
C. Carrie Liu – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Joti Nahal – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Kim Melton – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Navneet Sharma – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published |
|
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission. |
|
Source of support
None |
|
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest. |
|
Copyright
© 2015 C. Carrie Liu et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information. |
|
|