Table of Contents | ![]() |
Original Article
| ||||||
Knowledge, attitude and practice (kap) towards iodized salt utilization in HaweltiKebelle, Axum, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2015 | ||||||
Hadgu Gerensea1, Abadit Yohannse2, Berhe Baymot1, Hagos Atsbha2, Kidan Nguse2, Leterbrhan Gebru2, Selemun G/kel2 | ||||||
1Lecturer at School of Nursing, Axum University, Axum, Ethiopia.
2Care Givers at Axum University Referral Hospital, Axum, Ethiopia. | ||||||
| ||||||
[HTML Abstract]
[PDF Full Text]
[Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar] |
How to cite this article |
Gerensea H, Yohannse A, Baymot B, Atsbha H, Nguse K, Gebru L, G/kel S. Knowledge, attitude and practice (kap) towards iodized salt utilization in HaweltiKebelle, Axum, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2015. Edorium J Pathol 2016;2:1–8. |
Abstract
|
Background:
Iodine is regarded as one of the most important trace elements in the human body which required during the synthesis of thyroid hormones. Globally, 30% of the world's population is affected by IDD and more than 150,000 million people are affected in Africa alone. In Ethiopia, one out of every 1000 is a cretin, and about 50,000 perinatal deaths are occurring annually due to iodine deficiency disorders. In Ethiopia, there are scarce studies on knowledge, attitude and practice of iodized salt utilization. So this study may give some clue on this issue and may base line for other researches.
Aims: To assess knowledge, attitude and practice towards iodized salt utilization in HaweltiKebelle, Axum Town, North Ethiopia, 2015. Methods: A Cross-sectional quantitative study among 4763 households of Hawelti Kebelle was conducted by a face-to-face interviewing technique. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Majority (81%) of the respondents indicated that they heard deficiency of iodine in the environment and insufficient intake of iodine in the human body and some of the respondents were received information from television and radio 85 (60%), about iodine deficiency disorders and preventing them and majority of the respondents (83%) know why buy iodized salt because it is healthy and from the respondents 03 (2%) do not buy iodized salt because they do not know why it is necessary. Conclusion: Based on the finding of this study, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on utilization of iodized salt at household level was good. Using iodized salt, stored salt in a closed container with lid, heard about iodized salt, adding salt at the end of cooking was good. | |
Keywords:
Attitude, Iodized salt, Knowledge, Practices
|
Introduction
| ||||||
Iodine is regarded as one of the most important trace elements in the human body which required during the synthesis of thyroid hormones, which play a determining role in the process of the early growth and development of most organs, especially the brain, in human subjects during fetal and early postnatal life [1]. Globally, 30% of the world's population is affected by IDD and more than 150,000 million people are affected in Africa alone. In Ethiopia, one out of every 1000 is a cretin, and about 50,000 perinatal deaths are occurring annually due to iodine deficiency disorders, 26% of the total population have goiter and 62% of the population is at risk of IDD according to national survey made by the previous Ethiopian Nutrition Institute [2]. Iodine deficiency disorders are a global problem, and it is estimated that IDDs affect two billion people worldwide [3]. The greatest cause of preventable brain damage in childhood is iodine deficiency, caused by a low dietary supply of iodine. This is the primary motivation behind the current worldwide drive to eliminate iodine deficiency through the strategy of universal salt iodization [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)/International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders (ICCIDD) have approved a cut-off point of 20–40 parts per million (ppm) for iodine in salt. The goal is to have 90% of households using adequately iodized salt (= 15 ppm iodine) and to use salt iodine testing as an indicator for monitoring progress towards universal salt iodization (USI) [5]. Universal salt iodization (USI) is the most widely practiced intervention in eliminating iodine deficiency disorders (IDDs). Salt iodine testing is an important "process" indicator for monitoring progress towards USI [6]. The Quality and Standards Authority of Ethiopia, has set the iodine level to be 60–80 ppm as potassium iodate, after making allowance for losses of iodine during storage and distribution. In Ethiopia, the average consumption of salt per capita per day is 10 grams and salt with iodine content of 60 mg/kg would therefore satisfy the recommended daily requirement of 150 µg of iodine per person to prevent IDD [7]. But, there was no data that indicates the iodine level of salt both at the retail and consumption levels. Even most studies done outside the country did not try to see the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of Utilization. Especially in Ethiopia there are scarce studies on knowledge, attitude and practice of iodized salt utilization. So this study may give some clue on this issue and may base line for other researches. | ||||||
Objectives
| ||||||
General objective Specific objectives
| ||||||
Materials and Methods | ||||||
Study Area Period Study designs Population Source population
Study populations
Inclusive and exclusive criteria Inclusive criteria Exclusive criteria Sample size determination and sampling technique To obtain a representative sample systematic sampling technique was used to select the study population based on the proportion of the number of households, but the first house hold was selected randomly. All households at Hawelti Kebelle administration were eligible for the study. Hawelti kebele have four sub-kebeles in which the households were selected proportionally for each sub-kebele. | ||||||
| ||||||
Data collection Operational definition Poor knowledge: When the participant answer less than 50% of about knowledge questions. Positive attitude: When the participant answer more than 50% of about attitude. Negative attitude: When the participant answer less than 50% of about attitude. Good practice: When the participant practicing more than half questions of about practice. Poor practice: When the participant practicing less than half questions of about practice. Data quality control Data processing and analysis Ethical consideration | ||||||
Results | ||||||
Socio demographic Status Knowledge Status Attitude Status
Practice Status | ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Discussion
| ||||||
Findings regarding knowledge in the present study suggest that majority 81% of the respondents indicated that they heard deficiency of iodine in the environment and insufficient intake of iodine in the human body. Majority (94%) of the respondents were heard about iodized salt is slightly higher than compared with the findings of a study conducted in Bia District, Ghana [8] but significantly higher than the study conducted in Gondar Town [9]. A significant proportion of the respondents 60% indicated that their major source of information about iodized salt was television and radio; because of town communities are more accessible to electronic media. Forty percent of the respondents indicated that the health workers are their main sources of information regarding iodized salt and similar with a study conducted in Gondar town [9] which is 40.6%. This is very low as compared to a study conducted in LaelayMychew [10] which showed that 60.8% of them obtained information from health workers. Awareness creation and educational activities are sustained mainly in Axum; it is likely that all community would become aware of iodized salt and its importance to human health and wellbeing. Generally, the knowledge of the participants in this study was good. Findings regarding attitudes in the present study suggest that majority, 88% of the respondents indicated that the taste of iodized salt is different from that of common salt. This is very high as compared to a study conducted in LaelayMychew [10] which shows that 46.2% of households that taste of iodized salt are different from that of common salt. This misconception regarding the differences between the taste of common salt and iodized salt should be corrected through educational messages, particularly because it can act as a barrier and prevent people from using iodized salt. Findings regarding practice in the present study suggest that high proportion of the respondents 75%, stored their salt in the recommended way in closed containers with a lid at household level. This is slightly high as compared to a study conducted in Ghana [8]) which shows that 62.6% of households have stored in container with a lid. A majority of respondents 78%, add iodized salt at the end of cooking but 18% of them add iodized salt during the process of cooking. This is a very high as compared to a study conducted in Burie and Womberma (West Gojam) which shows that 2% of the respondents add iodized salt at the end of cooking [11]. | ||||||
Conclusion
| ||||||
Based on the finding of this study, we can conclude that the knowledge, attitude and practice on utilization of iodized salt at household level were good in Axum town. Using iodized salt, stored salt in a closed container with lid, heard about iodized salt, difference between iodized salt and common salt, adding salt at the end of cooking, and good knowledge, attitude and practice of participants about iodized salt were identified. Hence, households should be sensitized to importance of iodized salt and its proper handling continual and effective use of media for broadcasting health education programs in addition to house-to-house visits by public health workers and health extension workers to sustain and improve on the utilization of iodized salt at the household level. | ||||||
References
| ||||||
| ||||||
References
| ||||||
|
[HTML Abstract]
[PDF Full Text]
|
Author Contributions:
Hadgu Gerensea – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Abadit Yohannse – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Hagos Atsbha – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Kidan Nguse – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Leterbrhan Gebru – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Selemun G/kel – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published |
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission. |
Source of support
None |
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest. |
Copyright
© 2016 Gerensea et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information. |
|